The Supreme Court ruled that renewable purchase (RPO) obligations applicable to captive power consumers are justified. The order came in the case between Hindustan Zinc and Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission.
The SC has ruled that RPO on captive consumer is justified and interpreted it in the context of Article 51A (g) of the Constitution of India that cast a fundamental duty on the citizen to protect and improve the natural environment, and the mandate of Article 21 that guarantee right to live with healthy life.

Advertising

 The Supreme Court ruled that renewable purchase (RPO) obligations applicable to captive power consumers are justified. The order came in the case between Hindustan Zinc and Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission.
The SC has ruled that RPO on captive consumer is justified and interpreted it in the context of Article 51A (g) of the Constitution of India that cast a fundamental duty on the citizen to protect and improve the natural environment, and the mandate of Article 21 that guarantee right to live with healthy life.

Advertising

  The Supreme Court ruled that renewable purchase (RPO) obligations applicable to captive power consumers are justified.
 The order came in the case between Hindustan Zinc and Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission.
 The SC has ruled that RPO on captive consumer is justified and interpreted it in the context of Article 51A (g) of the Constitution of India that cast a fundamental duty on the citizen to protect and improve the natural environment, and the mandate of Article 21 that guarantee right to live with healthy life.

Advertising

  The Supreme Court ruled that renewable purchase (RPO) obligations applicable to captive power consumers are justified.
 The order came in the case between Hindustan Zinc and Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission.
 The SC has ruled that RPO on captive consumer is justified and interpreted it in the context of Article 51A (g) of the Constitution of India that cast a fundamental duty on the citizen to protect and improve the natural environment, and the mandate of Article 21 that guarantee right to live with healthy life.

Advertising

  The Supreme Court ruled that renewable purchase (RPO) obligations applicable to captive power consumers are justified.
 The order came in the case between Hindustan Zinc and Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission.
 The SC has ruled that RPO on captive consumer is justified and interpreted it in the context of Article 51A (g) of the Constitution of India that cast a fundamental duty on the citizen to protect and improve the natural environment, and the mandate of Article 21 that guarantee right to live with healthy life.

Advertising